Surfil
// By problem

Answer 'prove it' with a signature, not a slide

Surfil turns agent activity into offline-verifiable evidence: signed attestations, control-mapped bundles, and a tamper-evident trail your auditors check themselves.

surfil · charter - coverage
72%mapped
Controls mapped72%
Never labelled “certified”policy
Evidence offline-verifiablesigned
How it works

The chain that removes it

Compliance reviews ask for evidence, not assurances. Screenshots and self-reported logs do not hold up, and re-collecting it every audit is expensive.

1

Attest with Proof

Agent actions are signed into an append-only log that verifies against a public key, no vendor trust required.

2

Bundle with Charter

Controls map to the signed facts you already generate and export as offline-verifiable evidence bundles.

3

Hand it over

An auditor runs surfil verify against the bundle - no account, no network call, no trusting a dashboard.

First signed receipt: A signed, offline-verifiable evidence bundle mapped to your controls.
What holds

Why it holds up in review

Evidence, never 'certified'

Nothing at Surfil is ever certified; we produce verifiable evidence and let your auditor make the call.

Reuses what you have

Bundles assemble from facts and attestations already on the spine, so there is no separate collection pass.

Zero-trace holds

The evidence is metadata and signatures; your source never appears in a bundle in order to prove anything.

By problem

More in this view

Same spine, a neighbouring starting point.

Not the right lens? The same eleven paths are also organized by team size, by problem, and by persona on the solutions overview - pick whichever matches how you think.

Turn on the first stage today

The install is reversible byte-for-byte, and the first signed receipt arrives after one normal week of traffic.