Skip to content
Surfilby Adam Hafez

Portent: 1-second e-commerce sites convert 2.5x higher

Portent's aggregate analysis of 100 million page views across 20 sites found B2C conversion falls from 3.05% at 1 second to 0.67% at 4 seconds.

Published · 2 min read

Written byAdam Hafez
Close-up of a digital stopwatch readout on a car dashboard screen

Key takeaways

  • Portent's data covered just over 100 million page views and 5.6 million sessions across 20 B2B and B2C sites over a 30-day snapshot.
  • B2C e-commerce conversion rate dropped from 3.05% at a 1-second load time to 0.67% at 4 seconds, and Portent reports a 2.5x difference between 1-second and 5-second loads.
  • B2B lead-generation conversion rate was almost 40% at 1 second and 34% at 2 seconds, and Portent reports it 3x higher at 1 second than at 5 seconds and 5x higher than at 10.
  • The six e-commerce sites converted far less often than the fourteen lead-generation sites, since a purchase is a higher barrier than submitting contact information.
  • Portent flags its B2C data in the 10-second range as thinner than the rest, since it had fewer pages to work with at that load time.

Portent, a digital agency, went back to a question it has revisited across several years of its own data: does page load time actually move conversion rate, or is the relationship mostly folklore repeated from one blog post to the next. Its April 2022 analysis pulled from 20 of its sites and found conversion rate dropping steadily as load time rose, in both directions of its dataset.

What did the aggregate data show

Portent split its sample into 6 B2C e-commerce sites and 14 B2B lead-generation sites, then compared conversion by load time. For e-commerce, conversion rate fell from 3.05% at a 1-second load to 1.68% at 2 seconds, 1.12% at 3 seconds, and 0.67% at 4 seconds. Portent’s text places the 0.67% at 4 seconds, so its 2.5x multiplier against 5 seconds cannot be reproduced from the published rates. Lead-generation sites moved from almost 40% at 1 second to 34% at 2 seconds and 29% at 3 seconds, and Portent reports a 3x gap against 5 seconds and a 5x gap against 10 seconds, which imply about 13% and 8%.

Load timeB2C conversion rateB2B conversion rate
1 second3.05%~40%
2 seconds1.68%~34%
3 seconds1.12%~29%
4 seconds0.67%not reported
5 secondsnot reported~13% (implied)
10 secondsnot reported~8% (implied)

Portent’s own write-up is direct about the shape of the curve: “a site that loads in 1 second has a conversion rate 3x higher than a site that loads in 5 seconds” for B2B, and “2.5x higher than a site that loads in 5 seconds” for B2C e-commerce.

Why B2C and B2B sit so far apart

The two conversion curves fall at similar rates proportionally, but their absolute levels are not close. Portent attributes that gap to what counts as a conversion in each case: “goal conversions on websites are generally achieved at a higher rate than e-commerce conversions,” since a form fill is a lower-effort action than a completed purchase. That framing matters for anyone comparing this report against a different one. A retailer benchmarking against the roughly 40% B2B figure would be comparing against the wrong curve entirely; the e-commerce numbers, topping out under 4% even at a 1-second load, are the relevant comparison.

Portent also flags a limit in its own dataset rather than smoothing over it: the B2C data in the 10-second range rests on a smaller sample of pages than the faster loads. For B2C it reports only a 1.5x gap against 10 seconds, not a rate, and this piece follows that same boundary rather than filling the gap.

Why we care

Speed has barely moved since 2019. In the sample, 82% of B2B pages and 86% of B2C pages loaded in 5 seconds or less. B2B was unchanged from Portent’s 2019 run, and B2C rose from 81%.

Site type changes what “good” looks like. A team running an e-commerce checkout should not benchmark its conversion rate against a lead-generation site’s, and should not expect the same percentage-point stakes. The multiplier, not the absolute rate, is the number worth carrying into a business case for a performance budget.

The evidence

Period
30-day snapshot, published April 2022
Sample
20 sites, 5.6M sessions, 100M+ page views

Method: Portent pulled analytics data from 20 websites, split into 6 B2C e-commerce sites and 14 B2B lead-generation sites, covering just over 100 million page views across more than 27,000 landing pages. Page load speed was measured across 5.6 million sessions gathered over a 30-day window, then compared by load time, with conversion rate calculated per load time for each site type.

Conversion rate by load time (seconds)
B2C, 1s3.05%
B2C, 3s1.12%
B2C, 4s0.67%
B2B, 1s~40%
B2B, 2s34%
B2B, 3s29%

Sources

  1. 1.Site Speed is (Still) Impacting Your Conversion Rate - Portent, April 20, 2022Primary

Common questions

How many sites and sessions did Portent actually analyze?

20 sites, 6 B2C e-commerce and 14 B2B lead-generation, covering just over 100 million page views and more than 27,000 landing pages. Page load speed specifically was measured across 5.6 million sessions gathered over a 30-day window.

Why is the B2B conversion rate so much higher than B2C in this data?

Portent's own explanation is the barrier to completion. A B2B goal conversion is usually a form fill, "a simple exchange of contact information," while a B2C conversion is a completed purchase. That gap in effort, not load time alone, explains why B2B rates sit near 40% at their best while B2C tops out near 3%.

About the author

Adam Hafez
Adam Hafez

Founder, UpgradIQ FZC LLC

Adam Hafez works on technical SEO and search measurement: how pages get crawled, indexed, ranked and now quoted by answer engines. He founded UpgradIQ, which reads Google Search Console and GA4 to tie ranking movement back to the changes that caused it. He publishes what the data supports and states the limits of it.

  • Technical SEO
  • Search Console and GA4
  • Answer engine optimization
  • Structured data

The briefing

Only what actually changed in search, delivered in full by RSS, Atom or JSON feed.

Follow