Skip to content
Surfilby Adam Hafez

SearchPilot: nearby-region links lifted organic traffic 7%

SearchPilot split-tested linking each of 8,000 regional pages to its 6 nearest neighbors. Linked pages saw a 7% organic traffic uplift over controls.

Published · 2 min read

Written byAdam Hafez
Map of the United States divided into regions

Key takeaways

  • SearchPilot's client operated approximately 8,000 regional pages across the USA, each showing nearby physical company locations by geographic area.
  • The variant group added links from each regional page to its 6 nearest neighboring regional pages, roughly twelve new internal links per page on average.
  • The control group of regional pages received no new links, isolating the added internal links as the only variable in play.
  • Pages that received the new nearby-region links saw a 7% uplift in organic traffic compared to the unchanged control pages.
  • SearchPilot's own write-up does not disclose a confidence or credible interval for this result, unlike some of its other published split tests.

A site with thousands of near-identical regional pages has an obvious internal linking gap: pages for neighboring areas rarely link to each other, even though they compete for related queries and sit close together in the site’s own geography. SearchPilot, the same controlled SEO A/B-testing firm behind our FAQ content split tests, ran a split test on exactly that gap, on a client with about 8,000 regional pages across the USA, each displaying nearby physical company locations by area.

What the test changed

SearchPilot split the regional pages into a control group and a variant group. On variant pages, it added links from each regional page to its 6 nearest neighboring regional pages, roughly twelve new internal links per page on average. Control pages received no new links, though SearchPilot says all regional pages, control and variant, linked out to variant pages, so the comparison is of pages receiving the new links against pages that did not.

The result, and what is missing

Pages that received the new links saw a 7% uplift in organic traffic compared to the unchanged control pages. SearchPilot’s own conclusion was blunt: these regional pages had been starved of internal link equity, and giving them links from their closest neighbors passed some of that equity through, showing up as more organic traffic. Unlike SearchPilot’s FAQ content test, this write-up does not state a confidence or credible interval for the 7% figure, and it does not give exact test start or end dates, only that it ran as a controlled experiment on SearchPilot’s own testing platform.

A controlled experiment

This is a different kind of evidence than the site’s other internal linking coverage. JetOctopus’s DOM.RIA case study measured Googlebot crawl visits before and after one client moved links to a better position on its own site, a single-site, before-and-after read. Zyppy’s 23-million-link study went the other direction, correlating internal link counts against Google Search Console clicks across 1,800 sites, with no single site’s links ever changed as part of the study. SearchPilot’s nearby-region test sits between those two: one site, like DOM.RIA’s case, but with a genuine control group running at the same time as the variant, like Zyppy’s correlation could never establish on its own. It answers a question neither sibling piece can: whether adding links between already-existing, already-indexed pages causes a traffic change, isolated from whatever else happened on the site during the test window.

Why we care

Crawl visits rising, as in the DOM.RIA case, and click counts tracking with link count at scale, as in Zyppy’s study, are both consistent with internal linking mattering. Neither proves that adding a link to an existing page changes its organic traffic, because neither ran a controlled test. SearchPilot’s nearby-region test did, and it found a real, if modestly documented, uplift: 7% more organic traffic on pages that gained links from their closest geographic neighbors, control pages that received no new links. For any site with a cluster of related, thin, or isolated regional or category pages, that is the specific, tested case for cross-linking them to their nearest neighbors, not a general license to add links everywhere.

The evidence

Subject
SearchPilot's nearby-region internal linking test
Timeframe
test duration undisclosed
Verified
Yes, against first-party data
Organic traffic on pages receiving new nearby-region links107 % of baseline
Measured change
MetricBeforeAfter
Organic traffic on pages receiving new nearby-region links100% of baseline107% of baseline

Sources

  1. 1.SEO Split Test: Lessons from Nearby Location Links - SearchPilot, January 27, 2021Primary

About the author

Adam Hafez
Adam Hafez

Founder, UpgradIQ FZC LLC

Adam Hafez works on technical SEO and search measurement: how pages get crawled, indexed, ranked and now quoted by answer engines. He founded UpgradIQ, which reads Google Search Console and GA4 to tie ranking movement back to the changes that caused it. He publishes what the data supports and states the limits of it.

  • Technical SEO
  • Search Console and GA4
  • Answer engine optimization
  • Structured data

The briefing

Only what actually changed in search, delivered in full by RSS, Atom or JSON feed.

Follow